延展 发表于 2025-3-21 17:33:37
书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Constitutionalism and Democracy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0242391<br><br> <br><br>aphasia 发表于 2025-3-21 21:39:07
Book 2024an political institutions...The book’s approach is to use an interdisciplinary methodology by which it weaves a linear and non-linear aspects of inquiry. The book will be of interested to a broad readership, including those working in the fields of (constitutional) law, legal history. political philosophy, political science and political theory..信条 发表于 2025-3-22 02:12:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2424/242391/242391_3.png虚假 发表于 2025-3-22 07:01:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8ion of establishing the power of judicial review in England was over. The British refused to allow their judges to serve as the final arbiters of the law. Any natural rights would need to be agreed and cleared by Parliament. With the execution of Charles I, England began its long march of Parliamentprecede 发表于 2025-3-22 11:28:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8mas Jefferson played important roles in the protection of property generally. But it was ultimately Alexander Hamilton that out maneuvered both of them in securing the power of the judiciary, as the central authority and least democratic institution, as the powerhouse of constitutional interpretationauseate 发表于 2025-3-22 15:16:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2424/242391/242391_6.pngnauseate 发表于 2025-3-22 18:50:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8sible for an America that was opening up under the Jacksonian presidency. Wilson might have learned the lessons that theoretical textbooks, written by professors of democracy, may be an illusion once they step outside the academy and leave their armchair theorizing behind only to discover the brutal水槽 发表于 2025-3-23 00:02:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8s. Reason has been held as the “gold” standard in many domains of inquiry and especially in the law..How we interpret the “letter” of the law—that is by way of some “neutral” standard, by originalism or by or some other way—it always rebounds to the ground conditions. Language is a funny business. TGraves’-disease 发表于 2025-3-23 04:23:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2424/242391/242391_9.pngCompass 发表于 2025-3-23 06:31:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2424/242391/242391_10.png