Intentional
发表于 2025-3-23 10:35:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65119-9Stanley Cavell; Bernard Williams; Philosophical style; Emerson; Truthfulness
avarice
发表于 2025-3-23 16:33:08
978-3-031-65121-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
prick-test
发表于 2025-3-23 20:00:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2421/242042/242042_13.png
Kaleidoscope
发表于 2025-3-23 23:04:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2421/242042/242042_14.png
联想
发表于 2025-3-24 03:14:55
Sanjay Kantrao Kulkarni,Yuwaraj M. Ghugals through the analysis of two case studies, that is, two concrete cases in which these philosophers tried to solve this specific problem of style; and I show how the use of examples is not a marginal or secondary aspect in both authors, but is central to their philosophical stance. In fact, the way
叫喊
发表于 2025-3-24 09:14:13
M. Sudhakar,George M. Varghese,C. Natarajanwriting style for philosophical purposes. In this chapter, the philosophical purpose investigated in Cavell and Williams is maximal: namely, to show that style matters in philosophy. This is why, emphatically, “Stylistic Methods” speaks of . problem of style (and not just of one problem among others
缩减了
发表于 2025-3-24 13:04:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2421/242042/242042_17.png
使人烦燥
发表于 2025-3-24 16:18:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2421/242042/242042_18.png
有毒
发表于 2025-3-24 20:46:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2421/242042/242042_19.png
北京人起源
发表于 2025-3-25 01:37:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2421/242042/242042_20.png