travail 发表于 2025-3-28 15:29:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91150-2his thinking on evolution, and that truly it marks no significant theoretical shift from his earliest thinking about the nature and causes of evolution. Darwin saw the evolution of human beings at one with the evolution of all organisms.BOAST 发表于 2025-3-28 20:56:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241272/241272_42.pngExuberance 发表于 2025-3-29 02:37:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241272/241272_43.png哑剧 发表于 2025-3-29 05:09:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241272/241272_44.pngBouquet 发表于 2025-3-29 09:09:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241272/241272_45.png束以马具 发表于 2025-3-29 14:35:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9585-2Animal Aesthetics; Bateman Paradigm; Behavioural ecology; Darwin Descent of man; Darwin and Wilson; Epistwreathe 发表于 2025-3-29 15:45:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241272/241272_47.pnggerrymander 发表于 2025-3-29 20:49:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241272/241272_48.pngmajestic 发表于 2025-3-30 02:05:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91150-2lection. I argue that although the book is surely a little unbalanced, overall the discussion fits into Darwin’s strategy of explaining and extending his thinking on evolution, and that truly it marks no significant theoretical shift from his earliest thinking about the nature and causes of evolutioSOBER 发表于 2025-3-30 07:25:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91205-9d relate this to differences in their views of human evolution, and of cognitive ability and esthetic sensibilities of various human and nonhuman populations. We trace subsequent versions of these differing views into the twentieth century, and the controversy between R.A. Fisher’s Darwinian “runawa