事物的方面 发表于 2025-3-25 03:40:20
Inflection and Parametric Variation: Portuguese vs. Spanish,esented in some way in the mind/brain of the individual speaker. Ultimately, given an interesting theory of UG, by appropriately fixing the specific values of the parameters of UG, the facts of the particular (Core) Grammars should be deducible from the system of principles.fatty-acids 发表于 2025-3-25 08:23:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241203/241203_22.png全能 发表于 2025-3-25 11:50:51
Determiner Clitic Placement,988) for these matters. An empirical issue is then raised with respect to whether in some structural sense pronouns and determiners are of the same type. The intuition behind this idea goes back to Postal (1966), who specifically argued for “so-called pronouns” being nothing but a “determiner + one” (that is, . = .).英寸 发表于 2025-3-25 19:39:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241203/241203_24.pngAirtight 发表于 2025-3-25 20:04:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241203/241203_25.png移动 发表于 2025-3-26 02:30:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56710-0ntially like a finite clause with respect to null subjects. In addition, Safir has contributed three independent diagnostic tests of his own which provide additional empirical support to the view that the subject of inflected infinitives is . and never ., giving additional support to the view advocated in my article.即席 发表于 2025-3-26 07:56:36
Wetland Aboriginals in Queensland,988) for these matters. An empirical issue is then raised with respect to whether in some structural sense pronouns and determiners are of the same type. The intuition behind this idea goes back to Postal (1966), who specifically argued for “so-called pronouns” being nothing but a “determiner + one” (that is, . = .).nutrients 发表于 2025-3-26 10:51:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241203/241203_28.png破裂 发表于 2025-3-26 16:12:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2413/241203/241203_29.pngBROOK 发表于 2025-3-26 17:56:57
Felix G. Bello,Mathews Lambuliraves must be directly Case-marked. Certain problems that this raises for the analysis of expletives of Chomsky (1986) will be examined and a refinement of Chomsky’s expletive replacement will be offered.