Feigned 发表于 2025-3-25 05:25:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2402/240159/240159_21.png胡言乱语 发表于 2025-3-25 10:46:55
Tactile Reception and Life-Worldly Circumspection,of films. His comparison is centered on the peculiar concept of “tactile reception,” he opposes to the traditional way of perceiving art. The concept indicates that films do not require a contemplative, focused attention, but a habitual, distracted approach, similar to that by which we perceive buil装饰 发表于 2025-3-25 12:31:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2402/240159/240159_23.png漂亮 发表于 2025-3-25 15:51:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2402/240159/240159_24.png去才蔑视 发表于 2025-3-25 21:30:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2402/240159/240159_25.pngMacronutrients 发表于 2025-3-26 00:53:47
Sancho Panza and the Dialectics of Historic Film,nnect his interest for the phenomenological project of “material ontologies” as developed by Husserl and Scheler with his theory of film and his understanding of history. In Kracauer’s view, phenomenology, history, and film are similar in that they all require a “bottom up” approach, which engages cInnocence 发表于 2025-3-26 07:20:48
Conclusion,ical phenomenology” and its Husserlian critics. Among other recent publications, the present work distinguishes itself primarily by focusing on several key issues in phenomenology – the eidetic method for most part, but also questions related to experience and historicity – which come to bear in theGLIB 发表于 2025-3-26 10:31:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2402/240159/240159_28.pnghypnotic 发表于 2025-3-26 14:57:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2402/240159/240159_29.png地名表 发表于 2025-3-26 20:47:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2402/240159/240159_30.png