CUR
发表于 2025-3-27 00:38:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2401/240064/240064_31.png
Scintillations
发表于 2025-3-27 01:43:50
Health for All? Towards a Neo-Gramscian Critique of the WHO,UN, or other economic forums such as IMF, OECD etc.) in order to maintain, consolidate and strengthen the workings of the neoliberal order. This chapter aims to elaborate upon these studies by focusing upon the issue of health and in particular the World Health Organisation (WHO), to demonstrate tha
松果
发表于 2025-3-27 06:43:16
New Media and Technology Convergence,ike, who base their assumptions from within the boundaries of current traits of the global political economy, and assess activities from a theoretical point outside of these parameters. This collection of essays aims to build upon the foundations within this critical tradition, while at the same tim
groggy
发表于 2025-3-27 11:52:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2401/240064/240064_34.png
古董
发表于 2025-3-27 15:02:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2401/240064/240064_35.png
intolerance
发表于 2025-3-27 17:49:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2401/240064/240064_36.png
abnegate
发表于 2025-3-28 00:23:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/25/2401/240064/240064_37.png
frozen-shoulder
发表于 2025-3-28 04:57:14
,Being Critical about being ‘Critical’ in IPE: Negotiating Emancipatory Strategies,ywhere, and in a promiscuously wide range of contexts: ‘critical theory’ of different kinds vies with ‘critical realism’ and ‘critical reflexiv-ity’, alongside the ‘simply’ critical. From its earliest uses, in papers such as that by Hoffman (1988), to the most recent (Wyn Jones, 2001), there is a wi
Robust
发表于 2025-3-28 10:20:43
A Case for IPE Theoretical Plurality,eory. Within this relatively young discipline a case will be made for an opening-up of receptivity towards aspects of theory from other disciplines, that we might appreciate the potential for more accurately, more pertinently, theorising on the modern (or indeed post-modern!) world. At its inception
捐助
发表于 2025-3-28 11:13:29
Process, Project and Practice: The Politics of Globalisation,would have been met with scepticism at the underestimation of the sheer economic power of globalising forces. Indeed, even Group of Seven (G7) governments themselves popularised the rather convenient image of globalisation as a powerful economic and technological ‘bulldozer’ about which mere politic