散开
发表于 2025-3-26 21:20:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239865/239865_31.png
人造
发表于 2025-3-27 02:30:47
Is It Possible to Limit the Penal Intervention in the Twenty-First Century?essary to propose strategies that make it possible to limit the intervention of criminal law. In this direction, it is essential to apply the limiting principles of criminal law, particularly those of ., subsidiarity, and proportionality (necessity, suitability, and proportionality, in the strict se
终点
发表于 2025-3-27 06:03:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239865/239865_33.png
nutrition
发表于 2025-3-27 10:44:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239865/239865_34.png
Ventricle
发表于 2025-3-27 14:11:43
Enforced Disappearance: A Precedent of the Enemy Criminal Lawin Abu Ghraib (2003) or Guantanamo (2004). We pose that this . power is directly related to the preceding Terrorism of State (Garzón Valdés), in which enforced disappearance (ED) of persons practices in Latin America stand as its main antecedent. Our intention is to analyse the ECL metamorphosis and
cancer
发表于 2025-3-27 19:51:42
Criminal Law and Legal Theory: Not Just Legal Dogmatics, but Never Without Iteir historical weight makes them seem (for example, the debate about their scientific nature) and others are valid in the face of an incorrect practice of dogmatics or, better, in the face of “bad” dogmatics (such as the criticism of the prevalence of the system over the law). A correctly developed
NATAL
发表于 2025-3-27 23:50:16
The Populist Traces of Punitive Feminismthat populist politicians perform as soon as they assume power: colonization of state structures, mass clientelism, and discriminatory legalism. The latter assumes the Schmittian split of the . into friends (i.e., the . “people”) and enemies. Now, the discrimination criterion to legislate has develo
唤起
发表于 2025-3-28 04:33:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239865/239865_38.png
不透气
发表于 2025-3-28 06:35:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239865/239865_39.png
昆虫
发表于 2025-3-28 11:54:39
Legal Defeasibility: The Limits Between , and n resolving disputes and to take other considerations into account in their place. In line with this approach, this paper seeks to clarify the types of cases and the conditions in which, according to our established conventions, it is acceptable for judges to deviate from what is commanded in legal