代理人
发表于 2025-3-25 03:18:46
Mark Eisenegger,Lisa Schwaiger,Daniel Vogler Kosovo neither always belonged to Serbia nor was it always considered by Serbs as their core territory. This chapter investigates why, when, how and by whom Kosovo was constructed as Serbia’s ontic space. This process accelerated in the 1870s due to a particular set of changing geopolitical circums
harmony
发表于 2025-3-25 08:24:55
Mark Eisenegger,Lisa Schwaiger,Daniel Voglerg emotional component to their attachment to territorial integrity. Internal or external challenges to states’ control over their ontic spaces then do not only question their physical security, but may also undermine their ontological security.
myriad
发表于 2025-3-25 13:50:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239843/239843_23.png
粘土
发表于 2025-3-25 19:23:30
Introduction,occupation of the West Bank, which generates not only constant low-intensity threats to Israeli citizens but also existential threats to the state of Israel through a constant recurrence of wars and delegitimising campaigns.
制定法律
发表于 2025-3-25 20:46:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239843/239843_25.png
针叶类的树
发表于 2025-3-26 03:08:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239843/239843_26.png
Oration
发表于 2025-3-26 04:41:15
Introduction,occupation of the West Bank, which generates not only constant low-intensity threats to Israeli citizens but also existential threats to the state of Israel through a constant recurrence of wars and delegitimising campaigns.
finite
发表于 2025-3-26 12:11:19
Crisis, Anxiety and Ontological Insecurity,fined in terms of physical survival and power. This has been challenged by the Ontological Security Theory (OST), which is based on a premise that actors in world politics are often ready to compromise physical security and other important material gains in order to protect their sense of continuity
处理
发表于 2025-3-26 13:54:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2399/239843/239843_29.png
Blanch
发表于 2025-3-26 17:00:57
,Disintegration of Yugoslavia and Serbia’s Anxiety Over Kosovo,g emotional component to their attachment to territorial integrity. Internal or external challenges to states’ control over their ontic spaces then do not only question their physical security, but may also undermine their ontological security.