opinionated 发表于 2025-3-25 06:03:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2393/239204/239204_21.png名字的误用 发表于 2025-3-25 10:39:52
Coviability in the Governance of Pastoral Systems, Permanence and Change. How Does the Governance ofs the rangeland, firstly when resources were not sufficient (tragedy of the commons) and more recently with the new environmental challenge leading to functional integrity which is coviability at the level of the rangeland management. Indeed, functional integrity refers to the collective level in th柔美流畅 发表于 2025-3-25 12:18:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2393/239204/239204_23.pngAdmonish 发表于 2025-3-25 15:48:09
Wolfgang Sodeur,Volker G. Täube one wonders what will become these systems when we abandon certain usages or when the climate changes. Past landscapes may stir a feeling of nostalgia in us, but in this context the real question is what kind of nature do we desire? Which goals do we set for ourselves? We could think of a sustained细颈瓶 发表于 2025-3-25 19:59:55
scientific one. It only becomes so when a mathematical metaphor of an assertion in a different field of knowledge is “validated”. This requires validation processes specific to these fields; physics requires experiments, other domains resort to historical validations or more laborious exercises of切碎 发表于 2025-3-26 02:33:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2393/239204/239204_26.pngElectrolysis 发表于 2025-3-26 05:51:54
efined by climate change and biodiversity degradation, raises questions about the desirability of an anthropocentric environmental law, subjected to a neoliberal economic paradigm (we take here the example of French law). Furthermore, this law the vocation of which is to provide a response to the ur针叶类的树 发表于 2025-3-26 12:07:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2393/239204/239204_28.pngFlinch 发表于 2025-3-26 16:22:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2393/239204/239204_29.png保守 发表于 2025-3-26 19:21:49
ng the rupture caused by the dynamics of modernity with the historical conditions of coviability in the West. Afterward, this thinking will be put into perspective with the recent research in the anthropology of Nature, revealing a subtle paradox: even the methodical principle of an opposition of ‘s