评论者 发表于 2025-3-25 07:16:47

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2390/238991/238991_21.png

兴奋过度 发表于 2025-3-25 10:39:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2390/238991/238991_22.png

Lineage 发表于 2025-3-25 15:14:12

Jürgen Blazejczak,Wolfgang Kirnerlements a loser-pays system in which both court costs and attorney’s fees are shifted, subject to the requirements of . and .. This report will also describe a number of exceptions to the general rule that are related to the nature of the case, actions of the parties, and equity. Despite an extensiv

不能平静 发表于 2025-3-25 19:05:00

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2390/238991/238991_24.png

善于 发表于 2025-3-25 23:51:25

Wolfgang Glatzer,Werner Hübingernner (sec. 91 and 788 German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), sec. 113 Code of Family Proceedings and Non-Contentious Proceedings (FamFG) of 2009). The allocation of costs is based on mandatory legal provisions which exclude any discretionary fee shifting by the court. Despite some recent deregulation

围裙 发表于 2025-3-26 01:45:51

Jürgen Blazejczak,Wolfgang Kirnerhe amount of court costs shifted to the losing party was extremely low. In practice, the costs awarded for the minimum lawyers’ fees would rarely reflect the actual amount paid to the lawyer. These extremely low official fees were counterbalanced by the common use of contingency fee arrangements, wh

赔偿 发表于 2025-3-26 04:50:21

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2390/238991/238991_27.png

CRUMB 发表于 2025-3-26 09:06:37

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2390/238991/238991_28.png

FEIGN 发表于 2025-3-26 16:36:38

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2390/238991/238991_29.png

Rejuvenate 发表于 2025-3-26 20:37:17

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2390/238991/238991_30.png
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure; A Comparative Study Mathias Reimann Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Changes