改良
发表于 2025-3-25 06:15:36
Jiaqi Liu,Zhidong Cao,Daniel Zengal publishing circumstances, which include allegations of self-plagiarism, places in high relief the requirements of genuine authorship, the complexity of some self-plagiarism claims, and the challenges of requesting corrections of the scholarly record. Differing standards of evidence are often prop
ANTE
发表于 2025-3-25 08:17:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238750/238750_22.png
hereditary
发表于 2025-3-25 15:19:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238750/238750_23.png
ODIUM
发表于 2025-3-25 19:31:20
Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
组装
发表于 2025-3-25 20:46:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238750/238750_25.png
无价值
发表于 2025-3-26 00:32:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238750/238750_26.png
Aspirin
发表于 2025-3-26 07:31:32
Yi Liu,Yefeng Ma,Qing Deng,Yi Liu,Hui Zhanged retractions, errata, and corrigenda that have been issued in these cases. Attention is given to the variety of text manipulations present in the articles and book chapters that have been subject to corrections by editors and publishers.
Tidious
发表于 2025-3-26 09:26:06
Jiaqi Liu,Zhidong Cao,Daniel Zengbenefits to the larger research community. Researchers, editors, and publishers sometimes conflate standards from legal, moral, and scientific domains, and a lack of clarity about the applicable standard can significantly delay a proper correction of the scholarly record.
Parley
发表于 2025-3-26 16:31:41
Introduction,s of the expression ‘correcting the scholarly record,’ discusses the integrity of authorship, outlines the purpose of academic publishing, and distinguishes post-publication from pre-publication responses to plagiarism.
平躺
发表于 2025-3-26 17:42:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238750/238750_30.png