Interdict 发表于 2025-3-28 15:05:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238745/238745_41.pngJUST 发表于 2025-3-28 19:22:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238745/238745_42.pngHdl348 发表于 2025-3-29 02:13:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238745/238745_43.png客观 发表于 2025-3-29 04:15:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238745/238745_44.pngexceptional 发表于 2025-3-29 10:33:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238745/238745_45.png确定无疑 发表于 2025-3-29 14:27:33
ronmental cars in real-time, we show that it is decidable whether truth of an arbitrary MLSL formula can be safely determined on a given sample size. For such feasible formulas, we furthermore state a procedure for determining their truth values based on such a sample.ureter 发表于 2025-3-29 17:11:48
o not lead to the global worst case. We prove this by giving an example. A major problem is how to find an abstract semantics that guarantees progress on the abstract side. It turns out that monotonicity on the partial progress order is sufficient to guarantee this.JOT 发表于 2025-3-29 21:29:32
Ojonav Hazarika,Amit Kumar Mishrainite. The fair scheduler for infinitary control is perhaps interesting for its apparent unfairness: instead of treating all processes equal, the scheduler discriminates each process against finitely many other processes. However, it also privileges each process against infinitely many other processes (in fact, all but finitely many).某人 发表于 2025-3-30 02:42:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2388/238745/238745_49.png替代品 发表于 2025-3-30 07:39:48
Identifying Sovereign Defaults,tional results on causal equivalences and process calculi could help in this situation. In this talk we first identify four ways to exploit causality in security verification. In particular, this will lead us to review results on causal equivalences. Finally, we discuss how such results could help us to tackle the two challenges.