calorie 发表于 2025-3-25 07:12:10
Convincing the court: The Structure of Legal Proof,roof. The trial is where that process of proof is not only carried out but put on public display—where justice has not only to be done, but be seen to be done. The plausibility of the trial as a process of . the accused guilty is one criterion by which the ideology of justice stands or falls.Capture 发表于 2025-3-25 08:59:45
Police Powers and the Production of Evidence,res.—is that legal procedures surrounding arrest, search, and interrogation of a suspect limit their ability to conduct satisfactory criminal investigations and acquire incriminating information. Certainly a glance at the broad principles governing these areas of investigation would confirm the problems involved.configuration 发表于 2025-3-25 13:41:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2379/237868/237868_23.pngVulnerary 发表于 2025-3-25 15:58:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2379/237868/237868_24.png核心 发表于 2025-3-25 22:49:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2379/237868/237868_25.png单调性 发表于 2025-3-26 01:28:27
Introduction,stice and the macro-theoretical issues of the state and dominant ideology. This book is thus about the construction of justice not simply at the level of how verdicts are routinely accomplished but at the more fundamental level of how one central aspect of the ideology of the democratic state works.Rustproof 发表于 2025-3-26 06:52:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2379/237868/237868_27.pngsynovitis 发表于 2025-3-26 12:01:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2379/237868/237868_28.png帐单 发表于 2025-3-26 14:09:26
Introduction,y led in this direction by taking an approach unusual for a sociological study, focusing not so much on the routine interaction of the people who enforce the law but on the structure, substance and procedure of the law itself. Law is significant not just as the book of rules for criminal justice; itFillet,Filet 发表于 2025-3-26 19:11:25
Convincing the court: The Structure of Legal Proof,t deals in ‘just deserts’. What the ideology of justice is opposed to is . punishment. The important criterion in dealing out ‘just deserts’ is that the recipient should have been . guilty. The whim of kings, the barbarism of joust, the mysticism of magic should be replaced by a rational method of p