惩罚
发表于 2025-3-28 16:00:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2377/237607/237607_41.png
人造
发表于 2025-3-28 21:12:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9217-1ublic administration and a new assurance likely to withstand the change of government in 1997. Certainly, its incorporation into Regulatory Appraisal, a broader form of analysis which considers costs and benefits, suggests that the technique has the potential to become a more comprehensive means of assessment.
Migratory
发表于 2025-3-29 01:31:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2377/237607/237607_43.png
Odyssey
发表于 2025-3-29 06:52:28
Book 1998and the American regulatory impact analysis.Given the considerable importance of CCA, and the dearth of literature on it, the book makes a significant contribution to the understanding of public policy-making.
guzzle
发表于 2025-3-29 09:50:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2377/237607/237607_45.png
OPINE
发表于 2025-3-29 11:24:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9217-1nto effect in 1993, a Compliance Cost Assessment (CCA) produced by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) appeared to demonstrate that the costs to business would be large and disproportionate to the benefits to consumers, and it was eventually decided that the measure should be revoked.
Sputum
发表于 2025-3-29 16:16:16
Valuing the Froth on a Pint of Beer,nto effect in 1993, a Compliance Cost Assessment (CCA) produced by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) appeared to demonstrate that the costs to business would be large and disproportionate to the benefits to consumers, and it was eventually decided that the measure should be revoked.