伤心 发表于 2025-3-26 21:02:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2371/237091/237091_31.png旧石器时代 发表于 2025-3-27 04:28:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2371/237091/237091_32.png慢慢流出 发表于 2025-3-27 06:20:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2371/237091/237091_33.png不舒服 发表于 2025-3-27 13:08:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91044-4 indirectly, extricably medicalized’ (Frank, 1990, p. 136). Freidson (1970) points out that this state of hegemonic biomedicalism has meant that doctors have had a sanctioned monopoly to be able to define the continuum of health and illness and approaches to the treatment of illness. As生意行为 发表于 2025-3-27 13:43:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91044-4 — to focus on the teacher’s body or knowledge standpoint. There are certain theoretical and ontological implications in asking such questions. This chapter is an attempt to theorise about the way the bodies of teachers with disabilities are transmuted within the arena of teaching critical disabilit吃掉 发表于 2025-3-27 18:35:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91044-4n lauded as a defence to murder. This chapter continues in the discussion of how law imagines disability (the disabled existence) and negotiates some of the torturous questions related to ontology and volition. It explores how the . and the . can best be resolved through the prism of studies in ableMetastasis 发表于 2025-3-28 00:54:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2371/237091/237091_37.pngEuphonious 发表于 2025-3-28 03:21:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91044-4ability of disability. Following the insights and shortcomings of postmodernist theorists, Elizabeth Grosz (1996) challenges researchers to raise the study of freakery beyond being an object of prurient speculation. This chapter explores the notion of .. It will look at the ways people with disabili自负的人 发表于 2025-3-28 07:34:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2371/237091/237091_39.png意外的成功 发表于 2025-3-28 12:42:58
The Project of Ableismalise the landscape of thinking about race and gender as sites of signification. This Chapter presents a preliminary conversation in the emergent field of studies in ableism and desires to not only problematise but refuse the notion of able(ness). Our attention is on ableism’s production and perform