Glaci冰
发表于 2025-3-26 21:45:21
A Systematic Account of Russellian Analysiswed by the return journey to propositions which capture the truths of the common knowledge whilst avoiding the errors of the latter (.). The earlier distinction we made between narrow and wide interpretations of analysis is represented, respectively, as ..
anchor
发表于 2025-3-27 01:25:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236975/236975_32.png
路标
发表于 2025-3-27 08:40:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236975/236975_33.png
周兴旺
发表于 2025-3-27 09:55:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236975/236975_34.png
Acumen
发表于 2025-3-27 16:22:13
Constructing Victimhood in Culture and Law,Equally, Ayer is correct that Russell’s prime interest is in the “ontological question”. What remains at issue between Ayer and Weitz is the merely verbal question of whether the “central part” of Russellian analysis is ontological.
Texture
发表于 2025-3-27 18:10:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236975/236975_36.png
eustachian-tube
发表于 2025-3-28 00:59:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236975/236975_37.png
窃喜
发表于 2025-3-28 02:08:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236975/236975_38.png
独裁政府
发表于 2025-3-28 07:49:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236975/236975_39.png
种子
发表于 2025-3-28 11:19:54
0924-4530 s of mind on fun damental points were significant enough to cause him to successively adopt a diversity of radically new philosophical positions. Thus Russell is seen to have embraced and then abandoned, amongst others, neo-Hegelianism, Platonic re alism, phenomenalism and logical atomism, before