LANCE
发表于 2025-3-27 00:16:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2367/236682/236682_31.png
完整
发表于 2025-3-27 03:55:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2367/236682/236682_32.png
Lineage
发表于 2025-3-27 05:20:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2367/236682/236682_33.png
expository
发表于 2025-3-27 13:25:27
Prediction of Violence in Inpatient Settingsough the analysis will be presented within the framework of an ‘interpretive theory’ similar to those of Chomsky (1970) and Jackendoff (1972), I do not intend to concentrate my attention here on defending any particular theory.. Rather, I wish to illustrate some ways in which negative sentences diff
Carcinoma
发表于 2025-3-27 14:14:22
The Pharmacological Management of Aggressionhe same subtitle to this paper. I will be concerned here with the semantic structure of the verbs that Fillmore investigated, roughly those that relate to guilt and virtue, and will operate within a descriptive framework not much different from Fillmore’s.
SIT
发表于 2025-3-27 19:33:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2367/236682/236682_36.png
汇总
发表于 2025-3-28 01:56:19
Presuppositions,ut should be explained in terms of this general account. The notion I will discuss is a . notion, as opposed to a purely . one. This means that the presupposition relation cannot be explained solely in terms of the meaning or content of sentences, but must be explained partly in terms of facts about
vascular
发表于 2025-3-28 02:07:46
Incomplete Assertion and Belnap Connectives, should the theory be amended so as to provide an account? Philosophy of science used to answer that the criterion of success of a theory is that it need not be amended to provide an account for new phenomena. But in a science’s growing stages, the practice is to amend theories as fast as new phenom
sparse
发表于 2025-3-28 09:33:39
Speaking of Nothing,w a theory of reference, one of recent origin, might handle one of the major puzzles Russell mentioned. The theory of reference that I have in mind — and one I subscribe to — I will call ‘the historical explanation theory’. (It, or ones similar to it in important respects, has also been called the ‘
繁殖
发表于 2025-3-28 10:52:49
Harris and Chomsky at the Syntax-Semantics Boundary,. Harris and Chomsky differ on specifying the goals of research and in defining transformations. In Harris’ system, a transformation relates one surface string with another under certain conditions of paraphrase and cooccurrence. In Chomsky’s system, a generative transformation applies to abstract s