象形文字
发表于 2025-3-27 00:00:54
The Principle of Non-discrimination in the European Convention on Human Rights and in EU Fundamentalon Art. 18 TFEU and on Art. 21 (1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. It will analyze the interplay between qualifications and limitations of the scope of these guarantees imposed by the text and their interpretation by the competent courts. The article finds that both courts interpret the scope
induct
发表于 2025-3-27 03:10:04
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in Europe and Asiaan). The chapter will focus on violence against women and on trafficking of women, and on two regional legal instruments, namely the Council of Europe Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, and the ASEAN Convention against trafficking in person
媒介
发表于 2025-3-27 07:33:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236547/236547_33.png
plasma
发表于 2025-3-27 12:03:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236547/236547_34.png
Baffle
发表于 2025-3-27 14:38:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236547/236547_35.png
Inelasticity
发表于 2025-3-27 19:42:41
Gaofeng Pan,Xiaqing Miao,Ziyi Yanghts and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This raises the issue of how to determine their respective scope of application, which is not only a substantive question, but also a procedural one since different courts are entrusted with their protection, notably the European Court of Justi
collagen
发表于 2025-3-27 23:39:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236547/236547_37.png
integral
发表于 2025-3-28 02:51:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1274-8s intended to be an adaptation of the American model. However, the Supreme Court has undertaken a moderating role when exercising its power of judicial review and is frequently viewed as exhibiting “judicial passiveness.” With regard to the background of this passiveness, we examine three discussion
ALIAS
发表于 2025-3-28 07:06:04
Cong Zha,Zhenan Xu,Ju Xing,Hao YinIn those countries that qualify the ratified international human rights law merely as statute, the formal rank of international human rights law is often used as an argument against the binding force of international human rights law on domestic constitutional law. Through a comparative analysis bet
阻塞
发表于 2025-3-28 13:48:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236547/236547_40.png