crutch
发表于 2025-3-26 22:20:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236536/236536_31.png
大都市
发表于 2025-3-27 05:03:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236536/236536_32.png
FOLLY
发表于 2025-3-27 07:17:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236536/236536_33.png
强有力
发表于 2025-3-27 12:40:49
On Getting “Genetic” Out of “Genetic Disease”igence, race, and socioeconomic status (together with the opposition to and criticism of their work), have prompted reassurances from such distinguished researchers as Bernard Davis, who has argued that our “vast Ignorance” of the generic and environment bases of polygenetic traits “protect us again
BET
发表于 2025-3-27 16:56:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236536/236536_35.png
BORE
发表于 2025-3-27 18:48:23
Hippocrates Lost, A Professional Ethic Regained: Reflections on the Death of the Hippocratic Traditicomment on the “recent interest in bioethics”: this odd mannerism should call our attention to the profound changes in medicine proper that have made discussions of bioethics at all possible, changes specifically in the very influence of the Hippocratic Oath on those practicing in the field.
nominal
发表于 2025-3-27 23:20:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236536/236536_37.png
exophthalmos
发表于 2025-3-28 02:07:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236536/236536_38.png
尖牙
发表于 2025-3-28 07:32:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2366/236536/236536_39.png
肥料
发表于 2025-3-28 14:03:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7538-6tion.” Since he denies my argument is sound, even though conceding that my logic is valid, he presumably holds either that the capacity to procreate is important or that interference with this capacity is a violation of the right to privacy. I cannot see, however, that he has shown either of these possibilities to be true.