MOTE
发表于 2025-3-21 18:28:26
书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0236434<br><br> <br><br>
engender
发表于 2025-3-21 23:10:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2365/236434/236434_2.png
千篇一律
发表于 2025-3-22 02:53:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2365/236434/236434_3.png
单纯
发表于 2025-3-22 08:12:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3591-5uch aspirations. In Kant’s terms, which François Jullien evokes, the universal is effective as a “transcendental ideal.” Franke takes this thinking of universality and recasts it as culminating in the “apophatic universal.” The progressive role that the quest for universality plays throughout the hi
无弹性
发表于 2025-3-22 10:24:08
Der Preis der Freiheit: Absturz möglichsuch radical torsions as to gain features far from its common definition: (i) rather than being a simple and logically neutral proposition, it becomes a complex discursive procedure (producing meaning only when gathering at least two propositions), (ii) instead of serving as the simplest of the affi
disrupt
发表于 2025-3-22 16:53:10
Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy
disrupt
发表于 2025-3-22 20:07:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2365/236434/236434_7.png
Biguanides
发表于 2025-3-22 21:21:17
Is Hegel an Apophatic Thinker?hing, as the contradiction A is -A, and as the exhaustion of form by way of a dialectic with the apophatic. To explore this thesis, Brown discusses Hegel’s theory of knowledge from the “Preface” to the . He then offers an apophatic interpretation of the opening of the . and also reviews the moments
Fulsome
发表于 2025-3-23 04:57:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2365/236434/236434_9.png
TATE
发表于 2025-3-23 06:15:12
Apophatic Universalism East and West: Rethinking Universality Today in the Interstices Between Cultuuch aspirations. In Kant’s terms, which François Jullien evokes, the universal is effective as a “transcendental ideal.” Franke takes this thinking of universality and recasts it as culminating in the “apophatic universal.” The progressive role that the quest for universality plays throughout the hi