forecast 发表于 2025-3-23 11:55:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30992-2 partly to catalyse a major revision of the constitution which would have made the President the pre-eminent figure in the political system. He failed, but in a manner that leaves open the possibility of a revival of such attempts.Blasphemy 发表于 2025-3-23 15:47:54
Marcelo C. Borba,Daniel C. Oreyserve powers were retained in the British North America Act of 1867 and were still being occasionally used until the 1940s. It is also true that despite the Constitution Act of 1982 these powers have remained entrenched in the constitution. However, they are widely assumed to be obsolescent if not obsolete.Harass 发表于 2025-3-23 19:44:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2359/235876/235876_13.pngMAPLE 发表于 2025-3-23 22:34:33
,The Double Role of the Indian Governors: Kashmir and Andhra Pradesh 1983–84,serve powers were retained in the British North America Act of 1867 and were still being occasionally used until the 1940s. It is also true that despite the Constitution Act of 1982 these powers have remained entrenched in the constitution. However, they are widely assumed to be obsolescent if not obsolete.凹槽 发表于 2025-3-24 02:32:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2359/235876/235876_15.png值得 发表于 2025-3-24 09:39:36
,The Crises that Didn’t Happen: Canada 1945–1985, particular light for a generation or so after the event. That episode was the constitutional crisis of 1926, and it is necessary to recall it here since it forms a backdrop to every consideration of the head of state role since.FLORA 发表于 2025-3-24 12:40:29
,The Governor-General’s Part in a Constitutional Crisis: Fiji 1977, Parliament. The episode was important for the development of Fiji’s constitution and of the office of Governor-General. In addition, because the office of Governor-General is similarly constituted elsewhere, the episode in Fiji has a wider significance more possibly in the issues it raises than for the answers it offers.希望 发表于 2025-3-24 18:38:54
The Conventions of Ministerial Resignations: The Queensland Coalition Crisis of 1983,fell, to be replaced by a coalition of the Country (later National) and Liberal parties; and in 1983, when that 26-year-old coalition split and was replaced by a National Party government which, two elections on, is still in office.Hectic 发表于 2025-3-24 20:05:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2359/235876/235876_19.png混杂人 发表于 2025-3-24 23:59:23
Karen D. Wang,Shima Salehi,Carl Wiemanshould ‘guarantee supply’, form no more than a caretaker government, and recommend an election. An hour or so later supply had in fact been secured, and on 13 December 1975 a general election was held that was handsomely won by the Liberal Country Parties’ coalition under Fraser’s leadership.