LIKEN 发表于 2025-3-27 00:54:05

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2358/235731/235731_31.png

Interim 发表于 2025-3-27 01:29:38

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2358/235731/235731_32.png

nurture 发表于 2025-3-27 08:40:21

Introduction,uentialism has been under debate for a very long time, and the literature on the subject is vast.. Most of this literature concerns the normative plausibility of consequentialism, as compared to rival moral theories. It is frequently disputed whether consequentialism is compatible with a reasonable

DAMN 发表于 2025-3-27 12:11:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2358/235731/235731_34.png

怒目而视 发表于 2025-3-27 14:25:00

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2358/235731/235731_35.png

Cryptic 发表于 2025-3-27 19:14:26

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2358/235731/235731_36.png

hallow 发表于 2025-3-27 22:37:00

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2358/235731/235731_37.png

molest 发表于 2025-3-28 04:36:21

Alternatives and Consequentialist Principles,lternatives that fits into a consequentialist theory. Even if one has full empirical knowledge and a satisfactory analysis of performability, there is no obvious answer to the question of what the relevant alternative actions are, from the point of view of C, for a given agent in a given situation.

压倒性胜利 发表于 2025-3-28 07:50:36

Actualism and Possibilism,, and the problem of determining the relevant alternatives for an agent in a situation, discussed in Chapter 6. Roughly put, the problem is whether an agent’s own simultaneous or future actions should be allowed to determine what he ought to do in a certain situation.

antiandrogen 发表于 2025-3-28 12:36:39

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2358/235731/235731_40.png
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Consequentialism Reconsidered; Erik Carlson Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995 Consequentialism.agents.argue.moralit