大气层
发表于 2025-3-23 13:32:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2355/235443/235443_11.png
ovation
发表于 2025-3-23 16:33:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2355/235443/235443_12.png
容易做
发表于 2025-3-23 18:06:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2355/235443/235443_13.png
猛烈责骂
发表于 2025-3-23 23:29:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2355/235443/235443_14.png
Simulate
发表于 2025-3-24 06:17:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2355/235443/235443_15.png
Indent
发表于 2025-3-24 07:02:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4681-0 fundamental contradictions of capitalism that we examine. We reveal his bad reading of Marx (if reading there was), but also the defects of his very definition of “capital,” reflecting its proximity to neoclassicism. The criticism is then directed against his project of “tax revolution” and finally on his limited conception of democracy.
Perigee
发表于 2025-3-24 10:57:48
Thomas Piketty’s Regulation of Capitalism Through a “Tax Revolution” fundamental contradictions of capitalism that we examine. We reveal his bad reading of Marx (if reading there was), but also the defects of his very definition of “capital,” reflecting its proximity to neoclassicism. The criticism is then directed against his project of “tax revolution” and finally on his limited conception of democracy.
occult
发表于 2025-3-24 17:34:40
Translation and Fantasy Literature in Taiwanhe confrontation of theories and arguments should be inherent to the work of the researcher and constitute the driving force of the discipline, such a consensual thought, or “single thought,” is even itself thinkable?
STEER
发表于 2025-3-24 19:12:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4681-0also how the current mainstream is now prisoner of a very deep theoretical crisis. We shall also see in what sense its domination in the element of theory must be understood as inseparable from that of neoliberalism over the practice of development.
Mindfulness
发表于 2025-3-25 01:52:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4681-0tandard general market equilibrium model to sound more scientific and be accepted academically. We will see how these analyzes represent a defense of private property rights, a justification of the established social order, and a certain vision, extremely restrictive and oriented, of democracy.