Flange 发表于 2025-3-21 16:33:46
书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0235357<br><br> <br><br>有恶臭 发表于 2025-3-21 21:25:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235357/235357_2.pngPARA 发表于 2025-3-22 01:39:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235357/235357_3.png起皱纹 发表于 2025-3-22 07:51:29
Spinoza on Hatred and Power and the Challenge of Reconciliation ‘internalization’. His account calls into question whether forgiveness is ever really justified, or whether it could ever possibly be virtuous. So we might well wonder why a discussion of Spinoza’s psychology of hatred belongs in a discussion about forgiveness, reconciliation, revenge, or amelioratPARA 发表于 2025-3-22 11:55:49
Free Will Skepticism and Retributive Punishmentee Will Skepticism argument holds that we can no longer reasonably believe in the existence of free will or in the closely connected idea of moral responsibility. Without genuine free will, the power to control one’s own decisions, there can be (according to this argument) no basis for blame or prai松紧带 发表于 2025-3-22 13:10:36
Punishment, Revenge, and the Nature of Moral Philosophyare less successful than standardly assumed, I insist that there is a largely overlooked dimension along which the two phenomena are indeed quite different. This dimension relates to the role that narratives play in each: the avenger (unlike the punisher) must be committed to a certain narrative, to松紧带 发表于 2025-3-22 19:53:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235357/235357_7.pngWallow 发表于 2025-3-22 21:53:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235357/235357_8.png易弯曲 发表于 2025-3-23 04:19:09
The Dark Side of Forgivenessis the “alteration thesis” of forgiveness, recently defended by David Owens and Chris Bennett. Bennett argues that forgiveness is a “normative power”: the forgiver undertakes an obligation no longer to treat the wrongdoer as standing under the obligations generated by the act of wrongdoing. This, I诱骗 发表于 2025-3-23 07:22:37
Why Aristotle’s Virtuous Agent Won’t Forgive: Aristotle on ,, ,, and ropriate excusing circumstances. Aristotle’s virtuous judge, however, does not forgive; the wrongdoer is excused from blame in the first place, rather than being forgiven precisely because she is blameworthy. Additionally, the judge does not fail to blame because she wishes to be merciful or from na