Insularity 发表于 2025-3-21 16:50:51
书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Condorcet‘s Paradox读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0235228<br><br> <br><br>在前面 发表于 2025-3-21 21:19:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2353/235228/235228_2.pngagonist 发表于 2025-3-22 01:59:34
The Impact of Societal Factors,d in this context is the degree of coherence or consistency of voters’ preferences, as measured according to some definition of social homogeneity. Numerous studies have sought to find general relationships between these measures of social homogeneity and the probability that a PMRW exists. Some the浪荡子 发表于 2025-3-22 05:22:41
The Impact of Coherent Preferences,e-troughedness, or perfect polarization, the probability that a PMRW exists is quite high. When voters’ preferences are at all close to reflecting a situation in which a unifying candidate exists, the probability that a PMRW exists is very high. It is very important to note that the associated undercunning 发表于 2025-3-22 10:30:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2353/235228/235228_5.pngApogee 发表于 2025-3-22 16:14:42
Shanben Chen,Yuming Zhang,Zhili Fengthat are associated with Condorcet’s Paradox. There is widespread, but not universal, acceptance of the notion that the PMRW is the best candidate for selection in an election process, when such a candidate exists. When Condorcet’s Paradox occurs, there is no PMRW in three-candidate elections, and tApogee 发表于 2025-3-22 20:33:12
Ding Fan,Xiaochun Dun,Gang Zhang,Yu Shi, we must conclude that the evidence does not suggest that the phenomenon is widespread in voting situations. However, there clearly are cases in which the evidence shows that Condorcet’s Paradox has occurred in actual elections. The most typical observations of the phenomenon occur when there are aLigneous 发表于 2025-3-22 21:13:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2353/235228/235228_8.pngDemulcent 发表于 2025-3-23 04:02:12
Shanben Chen,Yuming Zhang,Zhili Fenge-troughedness, or perfect polarization, the probability that a PMRW exists is quite high. When voters’ preferences are at all close to reflecting a situation in which a unifying candidate exists, the probability that a PMRW exists is very high. It is very important to note that the associated underMisnomer 发表于 2025-3-23 07:16:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2353/235228/235228_10.png