Axon895 发表于 2025-3-23 10:17:16
Whence Moneyerstanding of money within the context of Concordian economics. Both parts analytically deny any validity to the “fractional reserve” theory of money, the assumption that money is created by bankers on the strength of money saved by depositors.该得 发表于 2025-3-23 15:45:35
Project Financial Independencehy is there such a thing as political oscillations between the extreme right and the extreme left? Why are communities disaggregating under our very eyes? No, the forces that catapult such issues forward are not psychological or political forces. They are economic forces.暴发户 发表于 2025-3-23 18:48:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2352/235123/235123_13.png抛弃的货物 发表于 2025-3-23 22:27:42
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610033when economics is included, the content is meager indeed. We have to reach the stage at which the political discourse is rich with good economics—ideally throughout the world, but let us start with the United States. This chapter is divided into three parts: Section . gives a look at what is being d高度 发表于 2025-3-24 04:09:28
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610033reality, we will focus a bit of our attention on a few key aspects of the central components of Concordian economics: economic rights and economic responsibilities. We will observe some of the relations that they establish: 1. Between individual human beings and thus in relation to the opponents of咒语 发表于 2025-3-24 08:40:35
Trade Unions and Wage Differentials,ek. Preeminent leaders of two schools of thought, although long gone, both still dominate and divide the economic discourse of the world. In a thorough treatment of the many interlocked questions, I have explored the issues at some considerable depth. I found solid barriers that made Keynes and HayeIntuitive 发表于 2025-3-24 12:56:39
Trade Unions and Revolutionary Politics, on this basic policy. But no. On the contrary, there is much opposition to it. Strange things we are being told of you these days. We used to call you, Cash, “King Cash” to signify our deep affection for you. No more. Ever since Jefferson deleted the word “property,” the most direct manifestation oLEVY 发表于 2025-3-24 15:20:42
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371323er for Human Values, is right (of course): “Rising levels of economic inequality and social immobility raise a challenge faced continually in antiquity, with fresh force: how, and in what circumstances, if at all, can the rich and the poor be enabled to act as political equals?” Perhaps not even forCardioplegia 发表于 2025-3-24 22:24:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2352/235123/235123_19.pngprobate 发表于 2025-3-25 02:09:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2352/235123/235123_20.png