magnify
发表于 2025-3-21 19:14:39
书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Conceptual Jurisprudence读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0234986<br><br> <br><br>
摘要记录
发表于 2025-3-21 21:12:56
Scope and Limits of General and Descriptive Legal Theorieshighlight some of the hurdles that these theories face by: (i) trying to identify and explain the . features of a practice that is considered to be absolutely .; (ii) proposing a . theory that explains only . concept of law; (iii) developing a descriptive or non-evaluative theory that does not descr
现代
发表于 2025-3-22 03:58:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234986/234986_3.png
obstruct
发表于 2025-3-22 05:24:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234986/234986_4.png
浮雕宝石
发表于 2025-3-22 09:07:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234986/234986_5.png
MODE
发表于 2025-3-22 13:46:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234986/234986_6.png
MODE
发表于 2025-3-22 18:38:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234986/234986_7.png
和蔼
发表于 2025-3-22 23:52:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234986/234986_8.png
态度暖昧
发表于 2025-3-23 02:21:47
Milgram and Hart on Resisting Oppressive Regimeslaw from morality compares favourably to non-positivist ones for it facilitates resistance against oppressive regimes. Since law is separable from morality, the argument goes, law loses part of its “aura of majesty” and thereby, the legality of a norm is not a conclusive reason for citizen obedience
Confirm
发表于 2025-3-23 05:59:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234986/234986_10.png