不如屎壳郎
发表于 2025-3-25 04:10:37
Conceptual Flux978-94-015-9462-2Series ISSN 0924-0780
凝乳
发表于 2025-3-25 09:58:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234979/234979_22.png
南极
发表于 2025-3-25 15:36:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234979/234979_23.png
小教堂
发表于 2025-3-25 19:04:05
Infinite Dimensional Optimization,en philosophers of mind, automatically know the details and history of Positivism and chapter and verse of Quine and Davidson. To those who do not, especially those non-philosophers (in psychology, cognitive science, linguistics, and AI) who could benefit from the book, this will be essential backgr
设施
发表于 2025-3-25 22:24:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234979/234979_25.png
神圣将军
发表于 2025-3-26 03:58:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2373-4o define meaning. I will call such a theory of content, built on an unlimited, non-idealized, unmodified conceptual role, . (SCRT). In accepting this theory that has been forced upon us, we also must accept what it entails: There can be no misrepresentation, and thus no error or false belief. I come
Predigest
发表于 2025-3-26 07:15:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2373-4best example being Logical Positivism). The advantage of well-crafted systems is that they spin out their consequences and answers to objections with ease. Once immersed in the system it becomes very clear what one . say to a whole variety of objections. The danger of course is that the answers one
forthy
发表于 2025-3-26 12:00:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234979/234979_28.png
Ophthalmoscope
发表于 2025-3-26 14:31:36
Groundwork and Overview of the Project,ism, or try to retain the notion of mental content despite the impossibility of misrepresentation. I will investigate the possibility of holding on to meaning and representation while, reluctantly, giving up on the notions of misrepresentation, falsity, and error. I will propose a way of understandi
Harass
发表于 2025-3-26 20:51:27
Verificationism and its Failure to Allow for Error and Misrepresentation,en philosophers of mind, automatically know the details and history of Positivism and chapter and verse of Quine and Davidson. To those who do not, especially those non-philosophers (in psychology, cognitive science, linguistics, and AI) who could benefit from the book, this will be essential backgr