NUL 发表于 2025-3-26 22:11:02
978-90-481-6300-7Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2003arrhythmic 发表于 2025-3-27 03:24:53
Lars Huettenberger,Christoph GarthIn this paper I want to explore Donald Davidson’s rejection of the use of the concept of language, when the knowledge of a language is taken as a sufficient and/or necessary condition for communicative understanding.DIKE 发表于 2025-3-27 08:31:17
Interpretation and Skill: On Passing TheoryIn this paper I want to explore Donald Davidson’s rejection of the use of the concept of language, when the knowledge of a language is taken as a sufficient and/or necessary condition for communicative understanding.处理 发表于 2025-3-27 12:18:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8399-2hereby not burdened with specific problems of that theory. It can remain open here as to whether this is a completely different approach: this depends upon where the core of speech act theory is seen to he; an answer to this question, however, depends upon where the boundary is to be drawn between s神刊 发表于 2025-3-27 14:59:38
The elementary algebra of K-theory,. But what sort of doings are sayings? It might be thought that this question has been definitively answered by John R. Searle’s account in . (1969). For haven’t Searle and his followers shown that in the case of speech acts the meaning of the utterance determines the act performed? On this view theinnovation 发表于 2025-3-27 19:23:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234942/234942_36.png改变立场 发表于 2025-3-27 22:40:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234942/234942_37.pngANN 发表于 2025-3-28 02:05:16
Topological and Bivariant K-Theoryticular. Since a theory of illocutionary acts is best seen to be a special branch of action theory in general, it seems to be clear from where the relevant principles of classification have to come from: (i) It is a general theory of action, in terms of which (basic types of) illocutionary acts areVasoconstrictor 发表于 2025-3-28 07:43:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2350/234942/234942_39.png肉体 发表于 2025-3-28 13:58:44
Deformations Preserving Gauss Curvaturentences combining sentences in different moods), have long been a source of difficulty for the view that a theory of truth for a natural language can serve as the core of a theory of meaning. The trouble for truth-theoretic semantics posed by non-assertoric sentences is that, prima facie, it does no