Oafishness 发表于 2025-3-30 09:28:53

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2321/232035/232035_51.png

pancreas 发表于 2025-3-30 12:39:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2321/232035/232035_52.png

朦胧 发表于 2025-3-30 19:40:24

Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/232035.jpg

强所 发表于 2025-3-30 23:11:37

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9DOM; Knowledge Interchange Format; acceptability; attack; automation; case law; concept-based search; defea

惊奇 发表于 2025-3-31 04:21:22

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2321/232035/232035_55.png

Grating 发表于 2025-3-31 07:46:02

Shabnam Akhtar,Javed Ahmad,Altaf AhmadThe DALOS Project aims at building an ontological- linguistic resource to be used in the multilingual EU legislative drafting process, as well as in a linguistically reliable national transpositions of EU directives. This paper outlines the design of the ontological-linguistic resource, as well as the main phases carried on for its implementation.

慢慢冲刷 发表于 2025-3-31 09:42:41

Building Semantic Resources for Legislative Drafting: The DALOS ProjectThe DALOS Project aims at building an ontological- linguistic resource to be used in the multilingual EU legislative drafting process, as well as in a linguistically reliable national transpositions of EU directives. This paper outlines the design of the ontological-linguistic resource, as well as the main phases carried on for its implementation.

Fibrillation 发表于 2025-3-31 16:59:21

MetaVex: Regulation Drafting Meets the Semantic Weblar word processors do not provide specific support for legislative drafters and parliamentarians to facilitate the legislative process. Furthermore, they do not natively support metadata on regulations. This paper describes how the MetaLex regulation-drafting environment (MetaVex) aims to meet such requirements.

裤子 发表于 2025-3-31 20:49:42

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2321/232035/232035_59.png

无能性 发表于 2025-4-1 00:26:18

Deterrence and Defeasibility in Argumentation Process for ALIS Projecte. The graphs associated with those games are interpreted as sets of inferences sequences between statements in the framework of non-monotonic logic. Thus an argumentation process is interpreted as a game of deterrence, which resolution determines the truth or falsity of statements, and the possible argumentation strategies of the parties.
页: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Computable Models of the Law; Languages, Dialogues Pompeu Casanovas,Giovanni Sartor,Rossella Rubino Conference proceedings 2008 Springer-Ve