赞成你
发表于 2025-3-27 00:10:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2311/231039/231039_31.png
雄伟
发表于 2025-3-27 02:59:41
,Grundzüge einer Soziologie des Sparens,ortsmen of the year, the winners of beauty contests etc.. The range of situations in which voting is used to determine which one among a group of individuals is considered as the best candidate is vast. But the situations involving voting have an even wider scope: also policy or action alternatives
积习已深
发表于 2025-3-27 05:29:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2311/231039/231039_33.png
发誓放弃
发表于 2025-3-27 13:11:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2311/231039/231039_34.png
Hemiplegia
发表于 2025-3-27 14:15:06
Carl Christian von Weizsäcker,Hagen Krämertcoming would that be? Very serious indeed, as one could argue that the very meaning of a social choice is in doubt should this happen (see Riker, 1982). More specifically, for a nontransitive social preference the fact that a R b and b R c does not imply that a R c. One important instance of a nont
过剩
发表于 2025-3-27 21:03:31
Carl Christian von Weizsäcker,Hagen Krämerimple majority. Surely it would be desirable to have a voting procedure that would always guarantee the choice of the Condorcet winner when one exists. Upon closer inspection several questions arise, however, concerning what exactly is meant by this criterion and how plausible it really is.
Generalize
发表于 2025-3-27 22:57:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2311/231039/231039_37.png
无表情
发表于 2025-3-28 04:08:22
Spark Plasma Sintering: Process Fundamentalsanimity, it would seem reasonable that the group should have its way precisely as it wishes. But what does unanimity mean in group decision making? Of course, if the group consists of n persons with exactly identical preference orders, then unanimity would be a straight-forward notion. But supposing
paradigm
发表于 2025-3-28 06:17:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2311/231039/231039_39.png
无礼回复
发表于 2025-3-28 14:15:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2311/231039/231039_40.png