忘川河 发表于 2025-3-30 09:22:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_51.png思考而得 发表于 2025-3-30 12:55:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_52.pnginundate 发表于 2025-3-30 16:58:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_53.png财产 发表于 2025-3-30 21:07:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_54.pngOverride 发表于 2025-3-31 03:40:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_55.pngErythropoietin 发表于 2025-3-31 05:21:52
Controversy Over the Availability of Frege’s Sense in Indian Philosophy of Language: The Case of J.Limarily concerned with the recent debate initiated by J. N. Mohanty whose position is that, in contrast to the semantical tradition of the West, where a distinction is maintained between sense and reference, a similar distinction is not found in the Indian semantical tradition. This is due to the faAnthem 发表于 2025-3-31 10:47:09
The Radical Emptiness of Empty Terms: Saving the Buddhists from the Nyāyahe Buddhists”, and then defends a view of empty terms that in some ways bears a striking resemblance to what Shaw wants to say. The main aim in this paper to show how some of the intuitions that might have led to their view (if Shaw is right) can be given a sympathetic explanation in terms of some r锉屑 发表于 2025-3-31 16:36:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_58.png