忘川河 发表于 2025-3-30 09:22:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_51.png

思考而得 发表于 2025-3-30 12:55:21

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_52.png

inundate 发表于 2025-3-30 16:58:53

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_53.png

财产 发表于 2025-3-30 21:07:40

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_54.png

Override 发表于 2025-3-31 03:40:11

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_55.png

Erythropoietin 发表于 2025-3-31 05:21:52

Controversy Over the Availability of Frege’s Sense in Indian Philosophy of Language: The Case of J.Limarily concerned with the recent debate initiated by J. N. Mohanty whose position is that, in contrast to the semantical tradition of the West, where a distinction is maintained between sense and reference, a similar distinction is not found in the Indian semantical tradition. This is due to the fa

Anthem 发表于 2025-3-31 10:47:09

The Radical Emptiness of Empty Terms: Saving the Buddhists from the Nyāyahe Buddhists”, and then defends a view of empty terms that in some ways bears a striking resemblance to what Shaw wants to say. The main aim in this paper to show how some of the intuitions that might have led to their view (if Shaw is right) can be given a sympathetic explanation in terms of some r

锉屑 发表于 2025-3-31 16:36:31

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2310/230963/230963_58.png
页: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Comparative Philosophy and J.L. Shaw; Purushottama Bilimoria,Michael Hemmingsen Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 20