接合 发表于 2025-3-23 10:56:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230881/230881_11.pngphase-2-enzyme 发表于 2025-3-23 13:50:51
Lay Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel,erning the distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment. Modern religious lay persons in Israel argued strongly against allowing the withdrawal of treatment based on a patient’s wish, by referring to the halakhic tradition.小步走路 发表于 2025-3-23 19:54:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230881/230881_13.pngNebulous 发表于 2025-3-24 02:11:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230881/230881_14.pngResection 发表于 2025-3-24 05:57:58
Sozialstruktur und Gender — Einleitungerning the distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment. Modern religious lay persons in Israel argued strongly against allowing the withdrawal of treatment based on a patient’s wish, by referring to the halakhic tradition.CIS 发表于 2025-3-24 09:11:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230881/230881_16.pngMast-Cell 发表于 2025-3-24 12:32:21
Sozialpolitik in der Bundesrepublikn the context of predictive genetic testing. We also examine how perceptions of risk are articulated within broader cultural scripts of individualism/collectivism, self-determination/relational ethics, and universalistic/particularistic lessons of the Holocaust.旅行路线 发表于 2025-3-24 18:33:03
Kriminalität als abweichendes Verhalten approach we suggest is useful for heterogeneous, pluralistic contexts that require a reflective juxtaposition of the macro and the micro. Such democratic deliberation can lead to the formulation of socially accepted directions for future practices.OVER 发表于 2025-3-24 20:09:43
Making Responsible Life Plans: Cultural Differences in Lay Attitudes in Germany and Israel Towards n the context of predictive genetic testing. We also examine how perceptions of risk are articulated within broader cultural scripts of individualism/collectivism, self-determination/relational ethics, and universalistic/particularistic lessons of the Holocaust.合唱团 发表于 2025-3-25 02:42:53
Final Conclusion: Disentangling the Micro and the Macro in Bioethics, approach we suggest is useful for heterogeneous, pluralistic contexts that require a reflective juxtaposition of the macro and the micro. Such democratic deliberation can lead to the formulation of socially accepted directions for future practices.