violate 发表于 2025-3-23 11:44:20
Digitality,uch technologies are part of the history of the Death of God, the loss of an overarching metaphysical framework which would bind us together in some form of relation or communion. Far from producing new kinds of community and relationality, these technologies effect non-relations, and non-communities, community without community.Constrain 发表于 2025-3-23 17:53:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2308/230717/230717_12.pngInstitution 发表于 2025-3-23 18:50:54
Darwin after Dawkins after Derrida,teenth century find themselves ….’. One result of this was the emergence of conceptions of the Universe as a machine designed and set off by God, similar to a clock or watch. Perhaps the most famous expression of the universe as a watch was by William Paley in his bookABYSS 发表于 2025-3-24 00:29:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2308/230717/230717_14.pngcollagen 发表于 2025-3-24 05:54:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2308/230717/230717_15.png不爱防注射 发表于 2025-3-24 08:31:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2308/230717/230717_16.pngAcclaim 发表于 2025-3-24 14:09:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2308/230717/230717_17.pngregale 发表于 2025-3-24 15:28:03
Derrida, Nancy and the Digital,arly in relation to touch. In ., Derrida analyses what he describes as a ‘humanualism’ that pervades much Western thinking. He takes as an example the essay ‘Sur l’influence de l’habitude’ by the late eighteenth, early nineteenthcentury philosopher Maine de Biran, in which he finds themediocrity 发表于 2025-3-24 20:17:54
Darwin after Dawkins after Derrida,h an idea is self-evidently the product of a culture or cultures in which handicraft is the main, if not sole, means of production. With the emergence of mechanistic philosophies, and mechanical means of production, this changed. In the section on the poet Gerard Manley Hopkins in ., J. Hillis Mille富足女人 发表于 2025-3-25 02:12:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2308/230717/230717_20.png