saturated-fat
发表于 2025-3-23 11:19:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230358/230358_11.png
Carminative
发表于 2025-3-23 16:10:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230358/230358_12.png
dyspareunia
发表于 2025-3-23 20:28:35
J. Briso Becky Bell,S. Maria Celestin Vigilaeliberative orientation that invites thoughtful engagement. Nowhere is such deliberation more crucial—and nowhere are the booster and critical approaches more at odds—than in discussions of risk. The opposition between these approaches is reflected in the way that risk discourse tends to divide betw
Intuitive
发表于 2025-3-24 00:10:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230358/230358_14.png
消瘦
发表于 2025-3-24 05:21:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230358/230358_15.png
AMITY
发表于 2025-3-24 08:09:17
A Brief History of Science Popularizationerms of the rhetorical situation, the history of science popularization is a history of a changing set of rhetors, exigences, and audiences. Understood in terms of kinds of knowledge, it is a history of shifting relationships between episteme (scientific or specialist knowledge) and doxa (public kno
有效
发表于 2025-3-24 14:32:42
Practitioner Perspectives on their CraftTS) in academic circles, the call for a new social contract from within science, and the call for a new model of communication from within the world of science popularization. These many sources agree with Nicholas Russell that the public ‘must be able to critique science as well as support it’ and
窗帘等
发表于 2025-3-24 14:57:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230358/230358_18.png
贞洁
发表于 2025-3-24 20:07:34
Expertise: Broadening the Scope of Participationl level depicts science as separate from (and nearly always superior to) other forms of knowledge-making, demarcation work at the individual level determines who does and doesn’t have authority to talk about a particular issue. Often this determination is based on claims of expertise, with categoriz
Entirety
发表于 2025-3-25 03:12:58
Ethos: Establishing Relationships with Readersscience and others arenas in civil society, and Chapter 6 looked at how individual expertise is constructed as a social category. While both have important implications for how texts invite readers to engage with science neither explicitly addressed the roles of the writer and the reader. This chapt