过于平凡
发表于 2025-3-27 00:49:40
Gowri Vijayakumar,Smitha Radhakrishnan have been evolving differently. This work identifies the decline of the development discourse, the rise of ecological modernisation discourse and the emergence of low carbon discourse from 2007 to 2015. The discursive evolution shows a potential for constructing the low carbon discourse.
Console
发表于 2025-3-27 01:21:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230343/230343_32.png
设想
发表于 2025-3-27 06:39:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230343/230343_33.png
Needlework
发表于 2025-3-27 11:32:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230343/230343_34.png
反馈
发表于 2025-3-27 16:24:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230343/230343_35.png
使乳化
发表于 2025-3-27 19:11:00
Communicating Climate Change Discourses in China,ate issues. The discursive structuration and institutionalisation can be seen as a process of a discursive shift from development to low carbon in the coverage. The three newspapers, due to the nature of China’s media system and climate governance, show very different features of communicating the climate change discourses in China.
needle
发表于 2025-3-28 01:43:50
Book 2024 seen as having a key role in addressing.climate change and receives substantial attention from the media. In the.Chinese coverage, climate change issues can be interpreted as various concerns.and ideas involving the dimensions of the economy, energy and emissions, public.involvement, science and ec
词汇记忆方法
发表于 2025-3-28 04:25:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97030-7and governance, climate journalism and coverage of China offers a platform for understanding and observing the dynamic climate discourses. Therefore, this work focuses on reviewing academic literature on climate politics, governance, journalism and coverage of China.
Cpr951
发表于 2025-3-28 07:25:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2304/230343/230343_39.png
倔强一点
发表于 2025-3-28 11:02:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97030-7GOs to construct climate discourse in coverage. However, . is labelled as a highly marketised newspaper and therefore it cites a wide range of actors as news sources beyond governmental bodies. And, this work selects a number of cases to compare and contrast the discourses between their own documents and the climate coverage.