微不足道
发表于 2025-3-25 06:13:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230226/230226_21.png
涂掉
发表于 2025-3-25 08:31:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230226/230226_22.png
心胸狭窄
发表于 2025-3-25 15:44:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230226/230226_23.png
Entrancing
发表于 2025-3-25 19:25:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230226/230226_24.png
Fecal-Impaction
发表于 2025-3-25 20:33:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230226/230226_25.png
植物茂盛
发表于 2025-3-26 01:49:02
John W. Sawkins,Valerie A. Dickiesome key features of an emerging rights scrutiny culture within the Australian Parliament, whilst also identifying the barriers key ‘behind the scenes’ participants face when seeking to improve the rights compliance of Australia’s counter-terrorism laws.
Dissonance
发表于 2025-3-26 07:35:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230226/230226_27.png
FRAUD
发表于 2025-3-26 08:38:14
Introductionterrorism policies. This suggests that carefully examining the role parliamentary committees play in rights protection should be of interest to all rights scholars, including those considering what reforms could be made to strengthen Australia’s parliamentary model of rights protection.
inspired
发表于 2025-3-26 15:32:07
The Australian Landscape and the Making of Counter-Terrorism Lawsry committees interact with the different law-making institutions at the federal level and the role they played in directly and indirectly identifying and addressing rights issues within the case study Acts.
填料
发表于 2025-3-26 18:43:30
Public Impactidentifies the important deliberative role parliamentary committees play in Australian law making and suggests that a rights-scrutiny culture may be beginning to develop at the federal level that could be a relevant factor to consider when identifying options to improve Australia’s parliamentary model of rights protection.