Flustered
发表于 2025-3-23 12:47:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2302/230176/230176_11.png
飞来飞去真休
发表于 2025-3-23 17:33:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2302/230176/230176_12.png
CANON
发表于 2025-3-23 20:19:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2302/230176/230176_13.png
修饰
发表于 2025-3-24 00:41:03
Text and Translation,The text is reproduced, with minor modifications and the addition of numbered sub-divisions, from . I 145–168, by kind permission of the late F. S. Schmitt, O.S.B. The superscript letters indicate the availability of a note or comment in §7, where the division number and letter are quoted preceded by ‘.’ e.g. ‘.1.11.’. Cf. §0.
Lipoprotein
发表于 2025-3-24 05:23:50
Commentary,The numbers shown at the opening of each note are those of the textual subdivisions on which comment is being made. The letters following those numbers are the superscripts given in the translation and text as an indication that the comment is available in connection with the words reproduced at the opening of each note.
tooth-decay
发表于 2025-3-24 08:42:00
Book 1974 of St. Anselm‘s dialogue De Grammatico. At the same time the making intelligible of that text has demanded the concurrent proffering of logical elucidations. The framework adopted for the latter is the Ontology of S. Lesniewski. The unsuitability of other current systems of logic for the analysis o
万神殿
发表于 2025-3-24 11:13:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2302/230176/230176_17.png
Epidural-Space
发表于 2025-3-24 17:37:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2302/230176/230176_18.png
托人看管
发表于 2025-3-24 22:39:45
0082-111X f the text of St. Anselm‘s dialogue De Grammatico. At the same time the making intelligible of that text has demanded the concurrent proffering of logical elucidations. The framework adopted for the latter is the Ontology of S. Lesniewski. The unsuitability of other current systems of logic for the
手段
发表于 2025-3-25 01:04:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5915-6cial language. Neither should the use of allusions to Leśniewski be taken to impy that St. Anselm was anticipating Leśniewski’s logic. However, as both the thinkers mentioned were concerned with general truths as to how things are, it would not be surprising if at some points they had certain theses in common.