EXALT
发表于 2025-3-28 17:26:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2297/229612/229612_41.png
Awning
发表于 2025-3-28 20:49:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2297/229612/229612_42.png
Pastry
发表于 2025-3-29 02:53:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73084-9 latter does not so much argue for as assume that metaphysics is a historical discipline. Sympathetic, Van der Dussen argues that the metaphysician uncovers presuppositions, but it is the task of the special sciences to change them. It is only in relation to other metaphysicians that the Collingwood
adroit
发表于 2025-3-29 06:22:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2297/229612/229612_44.png
DEI
发表于 2025-3-29 08:17:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80567-6church and that while there are family resemblances between Collingwood and philosophers of a pragmatist orientation, there are also some important differences. Collingwood tends to have in common with all pragmatists a rejection of the correspondence theory of truth. But unlike classical pragmatist
OTTER
发表于 2025-3-29 14:14:17
Dritter Entwicklungszyklus (iPad App)ained criticism in his . (2006). She argues that Collingwood’s metaphysics of absolute presuppositions aims to defend a form of epistemic pluralism which is not reducible to the kind of epistemic relativism Boghossian critiques. The decoupling of epistemic pluralism from epistemic relativism rests o
内部
发表于 2025-3-29 18:55:42
Erster Entwicklungszyklus (Papierversion)ll. Both Collingwood and McDowell, Dharamsi argues, acknowledge the irreducibly normative (in Collingwood’s words: criteriological) nature of the study of mind and both reject the widespread naturalist assumption that philosophy is continuous with natural science. The liberal naturalist’s and Collin