概观
发表于 2025-3-23 11:11:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26114-5Collective Consciousness; Durkheim; Husserl; Phenomenology; Representations; Objectivity; Subjectivism; Obj
GUILE
发表于 2025-3-23 17:33:26
978-3-031-26116-9The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
赞成你
发表于 2025-3-23 18:29:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229557/229557_13.png
GEAR
发表于 2025-3-23 22:17:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229557/229557_14.png
badinage
发表于 2025-3-24 06:09:10
Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Lawonvincing enough. The sole constatation that they have found in Durkheim valuable insights does not suffice. We must take our considerations to another level, reflecting not only on the fact that there is something phenomenologically challenging in Durkheim’s work but also considering the reasons why this is so.
hankering
发表于 2025-3-24 06:59:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18739-1tradition. However, is that the real Durkheim? Or is it just a name that conceals an unfathomed author? My point will be that Durkheim is misunderstood when the phenomenological background of his work remains unattended. The “true Durkheim” is lost when his readers disregard core concepts such as co
cushion
发表于 2025-3-24 13:19:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229557/229557_17.png
多骨
发表于 2025-3-24 15:01:28
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118461hilosophy of consciousness.” I will take this expression in two different although related meanings. First, I will show that Durkheim conceived of consciousness as intentional in Husserl’s sense. Second, I will argue that Henry’s critique of the philosophy of consciousness as a philosophy of represe
Conscientious
发表于 2025-3-24 21:01:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229557/229557_19.png
本土
发表于 2025-3-25 02:25:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229557/229557_20.png