Invertebrate
发表于 2025-3-28 15:04:32
Collected Papers of Stig Kanger with Essays on his Life and Work978-94-010-0500-5Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
Integrate
发表于 2025-3-28 19:39:02
Sheaves, Games, and Model Completionstockholm. My intention at that time was to present a technique of logical proof that would be easier to master than those usually encountered in textbooks on logic. Thus, the essay may be regarded as having a kind of pedagogical aim. It is hoped that this aim is not overshadowed by the technical character of my exposition.
幼儿
发表于 2025-3-28 23:06:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229528/229528_43.png
ACRID
发表于 2025-3-29 04:45:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229528/229528_44.png
vitrectomy
发表于 2025-3-29 11:09:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229528/229528_45.png
Expostulate
发表于 2025-3-29 13:09:42
Earth and Environmental Sciences Libraryn respect of a state of affairs. Rights can be of different types; for example, claim, power, or immunity. When a person X, for instance, has a claim to recover what he has lent to Y, this can be understood as X’s having a rights-relation of type claim to Y in respect of the state of affairs that X receives from Y what he has lent to Y.
Duodenitis
发表于 2025-3-29 17:46:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2296/229528/229528_47.png
agglomerate
发表于 2025-3-29 22:59:16
0166-6991 ined significant results in proof theory as wellas the first fully worked out model-theoretic interpretation ofquantified modal logic. It is generally accepted nowadays that Kangerwas one of the originators of possible worlds semantics for modallogic. Kanger‘s most original achievements were in the
机构
发表于 2025-3-30 01:54:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4047-4of this type can be found in practically every textbook of elementary logic. Within each type there are several variants. It should also be pointed out that the three types are not strictly separated but allow of hybrid forms.
Corroborate
发表于 2025-3-30 05:53:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1by these three kinds of philosophers all belong to the wide domain of ethics, and they are easily confused. However, we shall try not to confuse them here, and for that purpose, we may put them under three distinct headings: