fibula
发表于 2025-3-25 04:16:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2294/229340/229340_21.png
流浪
发表于 2025-3-25 10:28:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2294/229340/229340_22.png
固定某物
发表于 2025-3-25 14:19:42
Suzanne M. Buglione,Amanda Wittmansgust’ for the name Samuel: ‘such a vile short plumpness, such a dull abortive smartness, in first Syllable … the wabble it makes, & staggering between a diss- & a tri-syllable … altogether it is perhaps the worst combination, of which vowels & consonants are susceptible.’
stratum-corneum
发表于 2025-3-25 15:51:55
Marilynne Boyle-Baise,Paul Binfordt brilliant work was achieved he was a unitarian preacher veering towards pantheism; while this in turn recalls an immortal exchange with Lamb. ‘Lamb’, said Coleridge once, ‘You have heard me preach, I think?’ ‘Coleridge’, he replied, ‘I have never heard you do anything else.’
太空
发表于 2025-3-25 22:46:22
Coleridge and the Romantic Vision of the World,sgust’ for the name Samuel: ‘such a vile short plumpness, such a dull abortive smartness, in first Syllable … the wabble it makes, & staggering between a diss- & a tri-syllable … altogether it is perhaps the worst combination, of which vowels & consonants are susceptible.’
majestic
发表于 2025-3-26 03:47:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2294/229340/229340_26.png
缩短
发表于 2025-3-26 06:01:05
Drew Allen,Diana Strumbos,Janelle Claythe school and what did the school make of him? The question is all the more inviting since the answer might throw some light on some corresponding questions, still unresolved, concerning Coleridge’s continuing relationship with the world at large.
无力更进
发表于 2025-3-26 10:37:38
The Prism Effect of Service-Learninges of more general and complex human considerations. It was natural that Coleridge and the Royal Institution, soon after its founding in 1799, should find each other. The view that Coleridge was anti-science is quite erroneous. Nor did he believe in a world of two cultures.
沙草纸
发表于 2025-3-26 14:53:42
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137355737e with his manifold failings: . Certainly this view, central to Christian faith, corresponded exactly to the facts of life as he himself experienced them. His intellect, noted Southey in 1815, was ‘as clear and as powerful as ever was vouchsafed to man’, but ‘he labours under a disease of the volition’.
大喘气
发表于 2025-3-26 18:46:29
,Coleridge’s Anxiety,e with his manifold failings: . Certainly this view, central to Christian faith, corresponded exactly to the facts of life as he himself experienced them. His intellect, noted Southey in 1815, was ‘as clear and as powerful as ever was vouchsafed to man’, but ‘he labours under a disease of the volition’.