羊栏 发表于 2025-3-30 11:38:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2290/228948/228948_51.pngTracheotomy 发表于 2025-3-30 12:49:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2290/228948/228948_52.png离开可分裂 发表于 2025-3-30 20:13:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19691-6e is to bear fruit, he tells us, it must not be founded on some . of Science: some . definition, or ‘demarcation criterion’, like that which Karl Popper has always insisted on. (Popper’s . had appeared in the previous year.) Any epistemological theory developed on an . basis alone faced insurmountabCHOP 发表于 2025-3-30 23:55:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2290/228948/228948_54.png并排上下 发表于 2025-3-31 02:01:55
What Sort of Science is Semantics?ise. Fleck, according to Ziman, objects to “complete inadequacy of epistemologi-cal individualism”. Ziman recognizes in Fleck a kindred spirit. Fleck, like Ziman himself, was a distinguished and creative scientist and they both belong “to ‘science’ and ‘society’ as an active person”. But for Ziman t群居男女 发表于 2025-3-31 06:59:48
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/228948.jpg发牢骚 发表于 2025-3-31 12:55:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4498-5Holocaust; history of science; philosophy; philosophy of science; sociology; sociology of scienceEructation 发表于 2025-3-31 15:49:44
978-94-010-8504-5D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986ectropion 发表于 2025-3-31 18:39:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2290/228948/228948_59.png欢乐中国 发表于 2025-3-31 21:56:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2290/228948/228948_60.png