Amplify 发表于 2025-3-25 04:12:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2288/228718/228718_21.pngCytokines 发表于 2025-3-25 07:47:09
Ronald Coase on Economic Policy Analysis: Framework and Implications,ll exchange rights so as to move them to their highest-valued uses, irrespective of their original assignment, and (ii) Pigouvian remedies (taxes, subsidies, and regulations) are unnecessary for treating externality problems, since externalities will be costlessly internalized through the aforementioned market bargaining process.蚊帐 发表于 2025-3-25 13:21:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2288/228718/228718_23.png合乎习俗 发表于 2025-3-25 18:45:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2288/228718/228718_24.png教义 发表于 2025-3-25 23:04:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2288/228718/228718_25.pngAnecdote 发表于 2025-3-26 03:57:49
New Transculturalisms, 1400–1800ugh he was persuaded of the power of the market economy to coordinate the plans of diverse individuals in society, the proposition left Coase with a new question which ate away at him. If the market is so efficient and powerful in organizing our affairs, then why were there business organizations?MURAL 发表于 2025-3-26 06:20:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2288/228718/228718_27.pngObverse 发表于 2025-3-26 11:09:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/b137216nomics (Williamson, 1975; 1985) or the economics of organization more broadly (Milgrom and Roberts, 1992), the Coasean literature of the last 20 years has indeed focused precisely on the comparative transaction costs of alternative organizational structures, including, paradigmatically, the choice between firms and markets.Commentary 发表于 2025-3-26 15:11:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2288/228718/228718_29.pngchandel 发表于 2025-3-26 18:22:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2288/228718/228718_30.png