TOXIC
发表于 2025-3-28 17:42:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2270/226943/226943_41.png
Monotonous
发表于 2025-3-28 20:45:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2270/226943/226943_42.png
HEPA-filter
发表于 2025-3-29 02:37:23
Justice and Cross-Cultural Dialogue: From Theory to Practiceserve as a kind of public tribunal before which political leaders—from would-be emperors to petty dictators—would be held at least morally and ethically accountable. At a time when many “leaders” seem ready to go “berserk” and when our world is overshadowed by warfare, terror wars, and indiscriminat
forbid
发表于 2025-3-29 04:44:42
Dialogue of Civilizations as an Alternative Model for World Orderran, Mohammad Khatami, which designated 2001 as the Year of the “Dialogue among Civilizations.” In the same year, on September 11, the shadow of a future clash of civilizations came looming down with incredible velocity, leaving in its wake an atmosphere of fear, mistrust, and war. At the dawn of th
GLARE
发表于 2025-3-29 10:48:57
Dialogue among and Within Faiths: Weaving a Culture of PeaceThe end of the Cold War has not delivered the promised peace dividends, as violent conflicts (accentuated by post-September 11) continue to rage and destroy lives and the habitat worldwide. Human right violations still abound, including discriminations or even genocidal violence on the basis of cult
hypertension
发表于 2025-3-29 14:13:43
Civilizationism and the Political Debate on Globalization political sphere at the global level. Traditional political canons anchored in the nation-state and its domestic jurisdiction are increasingly perceived as insufficient, or indeed, self-defeating, in a world where socioeconomical interaction is, to a significant degree, interdependent and multilaye
intention
发表于 2025-3-29 18:44:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2270/226943/226943_47.png
不合
发表于 2025-3-29 22:56:12
Finding Appropriate Forms of Dialogue for Engaging with the Politics of Securitymarck: “To jaw jaw is always better than to war war.”. (We could argue, of course, about how much either man actually lived by it.) Where the rub sets in is that dialogue has been hauled into the service of quite different objectives. It is therefore necessary to think along the lines of “horses for