品牌
发表于 2025-3-26 21:33:13
Javelli, Pomponazzi and the Immortality of the Soul: From the , (1519) to the , (1536) the debate and produced an autonomous treatise, which he however entitled ., not .. This chapter reconstructs Javelli’s intellectual arc from the composition of his . (1519) up until the publication of his . (1536), shedding light on the reasons behind his unusual lexical choice in the title of the latter work.
Tincture
发表于 2025-3-27 02:12:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2265/226486/226486_32.png
河流
发表于 2025-3-27 06:46:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2265/226486/226486_33.png
Self-Help-Group
发表于 2025-3-27 10:39:54
Using Ficino: Chrysostomus Javelli on Love and pective. And in doing so, Javelli consistently relied on Ficino’s . on the .. Javelli, nonetheless, did not merely copy and paste material from Ficino’s text, but he re-elaborated it by making selections and by manipulating its meaning, all aimed at proving that Plato’s philosophy was indeed a ‘docta religio’.
的’
发表于 2025-3-27 15:06:28
Javelli’s , and the Dominican Exegesis of Aristotle’s , in the Renaissancerks of Dominicus of Flanders, Franciscus Thomae, and Girolamo Savonarola, before delving deeply into Javelli’s .. The chapter concludes with a comparison of this work to the commentary of Javelli’s confrère Francesco Silvestri, which offers an outstanding example of erudition and philological rigour
沙漠
发表于 2025-3-27 21:47:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2265/226486/226486_36.png
overwrought
发表于 2025-3-28 01:06:27
Chrysostomus Javelli’s Commentaries on Plato’s Moral Philosophytonic and mystical tradition revived in the previous century by Marsilio Ficino and develops one of the first interpretations of ‘Plato through Plato’, in a way that echoes sixteenth-century philological interpretations of ‘Aristotle through Aristotle’. Finally, the essay explores how Javelli’s Plat
Intend
发表于 2025-3-28 04:22:46
Neither Plato Nor Aristotle: Javelli’s Project of Christian Philosophye main tenets of classical ethics, concluding that both Platonism and Aristotelianism are equally useless for the development of a genuinely Christian philosophy. In his philosophically grounded confutation of classical ethics, not only does Javelli echo arguments and motives already presented by Er
set598
发表于 2025-3-28 09:28:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2265/226486/226486_39.png
Indecisive
发表于 2025-3-28 12:36:37
,Einstellregeln für PI-Mehrgrößenregler,rks of Dominicus of Flanders, Franciscus Thomae, and Girolamo Savonarola, before delving deeply into Javelli’s .. The chapter concludes with a comparison of this work to the commentary of Javelli’s confrère Francesco Silvestri, which offers an outstanding example of erudition and philological rigour