resilience
发表于 2025-3-25 04:46:41
Foreign Administrative Acts: General Report,ough cautious in proposing wider applications of its historically contingent findings, it suggests the possible application of this book’s theoretical approach to other national manifestations of Christian Zionism, particularly in the United States.
Glucocorticoids
发表于 2025-3-25 11:34:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2263/226243/226243_22.png
NOCT
发表于 2025-3-25 14:03:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2263/226243/226243_23.png
誓言
发表于 2025-3-25 16:44:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2263/226243/226243_24.png
arousal
发表于 2025-3-25 23:22:47
,“See with Your Own Eyes, and Believe Your Bibles”: The Jew Bill Controversy of 1753,violent and disloyal, and suggested that if naturalised, they would use England as a staging ground for their conquest of Palestine. For supporters of the Act, naturalisation offered England a unique opportunity to fulfil prophecy and restore the Jews to Palestine.
Arresting
发表于 2025-3-26 00:35:18
Introduction,sed through a modified version of Bauman’s concept of allosemitism. It suggests an eschatological “point of encounter” in which self and other momentarily cross paths. The introduction ends by suggesting a five-point framework for understanding Christian Zionism and “chosen” national identity.
Opponent
发表于 2025-3-26 07:56:17
,“Shall They Return to Jerusalem Againe?”: Jewish Restoration in Early Modern English Thought,estine and England’s national role, such as Thomas Brightman, Henry Finch, and Joseph Mede. The emergence of these beliefs is explored through hermeneutical changes and developing ideas of English nationhood.
陪审团每个人
发表于 2025-3-26 11:30:12
,“Ignorance, Infatuation, and, Perhaps, Insanity!”: Jewish Restoration and National Crisis, 1793–179f the English were “hidden Jews” is explored as a dynamic “point of encounter” between self and other. The chapter suggests that Brothers’s use of these ideas fits into the same logical framework as restorationist positions discussed in earlier chapters.
节省
发表于 2025-3-26 15:33:11
,“Direct the Eyes of the Jews to England”: The Jerusalem Bishopric Controversy, 1840–1841,on examines the controversy surrounding the establishment of the Jerusalem bishopric. In particular, it examines the interplay between prophecy, politics, and providence in the work of supporters in the London Society and Lord Ashley.
招致
发表于 2025-3-26 19:35:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2263/226243/226243_30.png