遗弃
发表于 2025-4-1 02:06:18
,Chenzhou Shipping Group Co., Ltd. v. People’s Insurance Company of China Co., Ltd. Guangdong Branch had the right to sue; (2) whether there was an insured accident; (3) whether the insurance slip stipulated that “failure to pay the premium would lead to the automatic termination of the insurance contract”; (4) whether the insurance contract had been terminated. The court found for the Plaintiff-Insured.
Enteropathic
发表于 2025-4-1 09:32:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225856/225856_62.png
障碍物
发表于 2025-4-1 11:25:51
Chongqing Wanzhou Yangjiang Shipping Co., Ltd. et al. v. Chongqing Sanyi Logistics Co., Ltd.,not a true party to the contract. The Defendant asserted its own counterclaim, stating that it did not pay rent because it had spent RMB1.2 million in renovation of the vessel and asserted that it was owed compensation for the necessary renovations and compulsory renovations.
Antimicrobial
发表于 2025-4-1 17:19:17
Fairwind International Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Vertex Shipping Co., Ltd.,tional orders. As a result, the Defendant filed an application for preservation of maritime claims. However, the Defendant could not obtain the Plaintiff’s correct business registration address because this information was not disclosed in the charter party.
Germinate
发表于 2025-4-1 20:12:51
Foreign Economic and Technical Cooperation Co., Ltd. of China Changjiang National Shipping Group et held that because the Defendant had actual knowledge that the Plaintiff’s name as stated in the guarantee contract was, despite the lack of conformity, referring to the same company as in the other documents, the Defendant was at fault in refusing to pay the Plaintiff and was liable for the amount claimed plus interest.
Isometric
发表于 2025-4-2 02:40:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225856/225856_66.png