Exaltation
发表于 2025-3-21 18:09:38
书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766–221 BC读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0225759<br><br> <br><br>
河潭
发表于 2025-3-21 21:45:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25134-6argue; bibliography; China; Chinese; concept; economic development; economy; history; history of literature;
天真
发表于 2025-3-22 04:01:16
Re/Structuring Science EducationIn the Introduction to this book a brief review of current literature on the AMP and its relationship with Chinese history presented three related questions: 1) Is the AMP conceptually sound? 2) Does it disprove the Marxist theory of history? 3) Has it any empirical validity in explaining Chinese history?
仇恨
发表于 2025-3-22 04:40:47
Conclusion,In the Introduction to this book a brief review of current literature on the AMP and its relationship with Chinese history presented three related questions: 1) Is the AMP conceptually sound? 2) Does it disprove the Marxist theory of history? 3) Has it any empirical validity in explaining Chinese history?
小溪
发表于 2025-3-22 09:57:05
Your Emotional Targeting Systemter of historical materialism, rarely sighted and much disbelieved’ (O’Leary, 1989: 331). Not surprisingly, the literature on this topic, as one of the highly-praised experts puts it, ‘has grown from a rock to a cape to a peninsula’ (Krader, 1975: xi). Much has been written not only by historians an
infinite
发表于 2025-3-22 13:12:01
Your Emotional Targeting Systemochs in the economic formation of society’ (Marx, 1970: 21). This crucial sentence formally introduced the concept of the Asiatic Mode of Production. This is the only place where Marx succinctly listed it as one of the modes of production. Both before and after he penned this passage, Marx wrote man
infinite
发表于 2025-3-22 18:59:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2258/225759/225759_7.png
NIL
发表于 2025-3-23 00:10:15
Julie Hollenbach,Robin Alex McDonald was called Xia. It was placed between 2205 and 1766 B.C. Nevertheless, up to now no literature which could be ascribed to this period has been discovered. At the same time convincing archaeological confirmation of its existence is still lacking.
责任
发表于 2025-3-23 02:30:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2258/225759/225759_9.png
Condense
发表于 2025-3-23 07:52:55
Re/Structuring Science Education). However, most scholars extend this period to 221 BC when China was reunited by Qin Shi Huang Di (the First Emperor of Qin, 259–210 BC). Within the Eastern Zhou two distinctive, though not chronologically connected, periods can be located. They are known as the Chun Qiu period (the Spring and Autu