傻瓜
发表于 2025-3-26 23:40:44
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platform difficult to read: apart from explicit statements to that effect, there is also the indirect evidence for this in the appearance of marginal and interlinear glosses in Chaucerian MSS., and most convincingly in the publication of an edition of Chaucer with an extensive glossary.
jeopardize
发表于 2025-3-27 05:09:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224183/224183_32.png
CORE
发表于 2025-3-27 09:16:21
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platforme importance of Cockeram chiefly lies in his continuation of the Speght tradition, and in his transmission of a corpus of Speghtian words to later compilers, even though his own selection among these words is not of great interest and does not seem to have been a careful one.
arsenal
发表于 2025-3-27 12:38:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224183/224183_34.png
松软
发表于 2025-3-27 14:05:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0183-0 seventeenth century. Over 50% of the items in his long appendix of old words are based, directly and indirectly, on Speght’s glossaries. This appendix may be looked upon as the first Middle English dictionary, meant for the educated reader and the scholar, rather than for the general public. The im
过份
发表于 2025-3-27 18:51:49
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platformdebted to Coles’ . and therefore in a great many instances ultimately to Speght. The immediate effect of the expansion was that the alphabetical distribution of old words in this dictionary became more even than in the dictionary of which it was an abridgement.
GRAVE
发表于 2025-3-28 01:51:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224183/224183_37.png
痴呆
发表于 2025-3-28 05:51:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224183/224183_38.png
忍受
发表于 2025-3-28 07:15:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0183-0ed as ‘Chaucerian’ (while many of his ‘old’ words were also from Chaucer) and by the fact that in later editions of his dictionary published during his lifetime (1662, 1671 and 1678) there is some inconsistency in the marking of old words.
终止
发表于 2025-3-28 13:37:00
Edward Phillips:, (1658)ed as ‘Chaucerian’ (while many of his ‘old’ words were also from Chaucer) and by the fact that in later editions of his dictionary published during his lifetime (1662, 1671 and 1678) there is some inconsistency in the marking of old words.